Anti-Corruption Agency edit
extracted from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
(using Wikipedia Reflection Script)
|
Anti-Corruption Agency edit
|
|
| Malaysia |
 This article is part of the series: |
|
|
|
Government
Executive
Legislative
Judiciary
Elections
Foreign Policy
Subdivisions
|
|
Other countries · Atlas Politics portal |
The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) (Malay: Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia, SPRM) is a government agency in Malaysia that investigates and persecutes corruption in the public and private sectors. The MACC is currently headed by Director-General Haji Ahmad Said bin Hamdan. He was appointed in May 2007 to replace former Director-General Zulkipli Mat Nor.
The agency is currently under the Prime Minister's Department.
Contents |
The Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi has announced far-reaching reforms to the Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) to give it independence and more bite. The reforms include turning the Anti-Corruption Agency into a “full-fledged” Malaysian Commission on Anti-Corruption (MCAC), setting up an independent advisory board and a parliamentary committee, as well as tripling the size of the force and providing comprehensive protection for whistleblowers. 1
Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said the reforms were a priority and he wanted them in place before the year's end. There has been some restlessness among some Barisan Nasional MPs over the setting up of a commission which will have more autonomy and bite to tackle corruption in the country. They worry that there could be an explosion of reports and false allegations against politicians by members of the Opposition.2 The Barisan Nasional supreme council appears to have accepted Datuk Seri Abdullah Badawi’s reforms in the form of his proposed legislation to set up the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MCAC) and Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC). 3
“It is my fervent hope that by restructuring the ACA, its effectiveness, transparency and accountability will be considerably raised while public trust in its integrity and independence be quickly renewed,” he said yesterday in his keynote address at the Asean Integrity Dialogue 2008 at the Malaysian Institute of Integrity.
Elaborating on the four key reforms, Abdullah said the restructured MCAC would table its annual report to a soon-to-be set up parliamentary committee on the prevention of corruption which would have the power to seek clarification and explanation on the report.
Another core element, he said, was the setting up of an independent corruption prevention advisory board comprising “prominent and upstanding” members of the community appointed by the King, on the Prime Minister's advice, to advise the MCAC on administrative and operational matters and on cases of public interest.
“The board can enquire or recommend that certain measures be undertaken. More importantly, the board will act to assure the public that public interest cases are dealt with appropriately and adequately,” he said. The government also stated that Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) is empowered to investigate graft in the private sector.4
However, the ultimate decision to prosecute would lie with the Attorney-General although the board could ask him to take another look at cases he had decided not to pursue.
On whistleblowers, Abdullah said the public perception was that enforcement agencies often went after the whistleblower instead of investigating the charges.
He announced that there would be a law in place to give whistleblowers and witnesses “comprehensive protection”.
“It is our hope that with better protection, more people will come forward to report corruption, thereby allowing justice to run its course,” he said, adding, however, this was not “unfettered freedom” for people to say or write anything about anybody without proof.
“I expect them to be responsible for the allegations they make,” he said. Abdullah also announced that the anti-corruption force would triple in size over the next five years, with a further 5,000 officers added to its existing 2,000 members.
The MCAC would also have new terms of service and remuneration to attract talented and dedicated individuals, and the power to hire and fire, he added. The head of the MCAC would be appointed by the King on the Prime Minister's advice. Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission officers will be paid higher salaries as they go all out to weed out corruption according to the government. 5
Abdullah said he expected the MCAC to be “fully independent”. “I am not here to interfere. They can independently decide how to run the organisation and how they want to operate,” he said, adding that even in the current set-up, he had never interfered with the work of the ACA.
Asked whether the MCAC would report to the Prime Minister or to Parliament, Abdullah said: “The report would ultimately go to Parliament.” When contacted, Attorney General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail said he would have no problem working with the advisory panel to be set up by the MCAC.
The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission(MACC) and the Judicial Appointments Commission(JAC) Bills were passed without a single amendment in the Dewan Rakyat, despite the constant flow of criticisms and attempts from Pakatan Rakyat MPs or Opposition MPs to insert new amendments and changes to the Bills. Opposition MPs were concerned over the independence of the MACC since it will not have any power to prosecute.6
In one of the first complains, members of Parti Keadilan Rakyat, led by its supreme council member Badrul Hisham Shaharin, lodged a report with the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission on 2 January, 2008 on a list of cases of alleged abuse of power involving Barisan Nasional politicians, particularly from Umno, on various allegations of corruption dating back years. 7 The report called for the Commission reopen and investigate cases involving former International Trade and Industry Minister Tan Sri Rafidah Aziz and former Malacca chief minister Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Thamby Chik. Hisham said some of the cases involved Umno politicians, who had allegedly bribed members for votes and also a few 'irregularities' involving senior politicians.8